Category: Electronic Payments
April 7th, 2014 by Elma Jane
Business-to-business ecommerce describes Internet-enabled transactions between businesses, such as a manufacturer and a wholesaler, a wholesaler and a retailers, or a wholesaler and a business user. The B-to-B ecommerce market was expected to exceed $550 billion in the U.S. last year, offering great opportunities for distributors and manufacturers to streamline sales, boost profits, and engage with new customers.
Since the late 1990s, businesses have been using the Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) system to transfer purchase orders and similar structured information electronically, representing, if you will, a form of B-to-B ecommerce.
Separately, some B-to-B sellers have created websites on which business customers can make purchases as if they were shopping on a business-to-consumer site. This category of B-to-B ecommerce may enjoy the most growth and offer the most opportunity.
Important points to consider of running a B-to-B ecommerce site.
B-to-B Customers Are also B-to-C Customers
B-to-B sites often trail consumer sites in technology, function, capabilities, and design. Typically not good enough.
As an example, the U.S. B-to-B site for a major multinational manufacturer, which includes information for dealers in the U.S., can only be viewed on Internet Explorer, and won’t work in any other browser, including Firefox, Chrome, Opera, or Safari. And don’t even think about visiting this site on a mobile device. It just won’t work.
This is a ridiculous business decision. It forgets a fundamental fact about B-to-B ecommerce customers. They are also B-to-C ecommerce customers.
It is extremely likely that the professional shopper on an ecommerce-enabled B-to-B website has had at least some experience shopping on consumer ecommerce sites, which all have compelling product photography, good navigation, good search capabilities, and good content.
A B-to-B ecommerce site must provide the same visual and functional experience as the best B-to-C ecommerce sites.
Personalization Is Vital
B-to-B shoppers may require a greater level of personalization than B-to-C customers, since businesses may have contract prices, special payment terms, or negotiated shipping rates.
Business relationships may be very deep and complicated. It is not unusual for B-to-B ecommerce sites to require registration before showing prices or shipping rates or offering a quote. This login requirement allows the B-to-B ecommerce site to personalize almost every aspect of the transaction.
A good B-to-B ecommerce site may take a little longer to launch since the system for handling relatively complex business relationships can take some time. But once it is in place, this personalization will mean that the relationship could be longer lasting.
Sales people Are the Primary Marketing Vehicle
While it is both possible and likely that B-to-B ecommerce sites will be able to acquire new customers simply by making products easy to order online, salespeople who contact customers are probably the B-to-B ecommerce seller’s primary and best marketing channel.
Salespeople can attract new customers or deepen relationships with existing shoppers. Sometimes, it can be enough to follow up after a B-to-B sale with a call to make certain that the transaction went as expected.
Shopping Is Part of Your Customer’s Profession
One of the most significant differences between B-to-B and B-to-C ecommerce is that shopping is part of the B-to-B ecommerce customer’s daytime job.
This means that the stakes can be higher for the B-to-B seller. If the shopper has a good experience, that shopper is likely to return and reorder repeatedly – even suggesting the seller to co-workers or other divisions. But if something goes wrong, particularly something that would cause the shopper to miss deadlines at work or appear in some way to have done a poor job, that shopper will likely blame the B-to-B seller. Depending on the unhappy shopper’s influence, the B-to-B seller might lose the entire account, including many individual buyers or divisions.
This means that order handling and transactional communications must be top notch. Some B-to-B ecommerce sellers will call customers to confirm orders or shipments when the customer has ordered a large quantity, very expensive items, or requested express shipping, since these orders may represent important transactions to the customer.
What Ecommerce Can Do for your B-to-B Business
If you sell to other businesses, ecommerce should have three potential benefits for your business.
First, it may help new customers find you. Having an easy-to-find and use ecommerce site means that new customers – customers with a need – will be able to locate your business regardless of geography or prior relationships.
Second, B-to-B ecommerce may streamline sales for existing customers. Some of your current customers will appreciate the ability to order online, 24 hours a day 7 days a week. The process may also be faster than sending emails or, even worse, faxed orders.
Finally, B-to-B ecommerce may improve margins and boost profits. It may be possible to provide customers with a better ordering experience and better customer service using ecommerce while spending less on labor and order processing. Any cost savings that B-to-B ecommerce brings may drop straight to your business’s bottom line.
Posted in Credit card Processing, e-commerce & m-commerce, Electronic Payments, Internet Payment Gateway, Mobile Payments, Mobile Point of Sale, Small Business Improvement Tagged with: account, b-to-b, b-to-c, better ordering experience, boost profits, business-to-business, business-to-consumer, business's bottom line, communication, consumer, cost savings, customer service, e-commerce, ecommerce, ecommerce sites, electronic data interchange, faxed orders, growth, improve margins, new customers, online, order handling, order processing, personalization, profits, purchase orders, salespeople, seller, sending emails, shopper, special payment terms, transaction, wholesaler
March 31st, 2014 by Elma Jane
A payment processor is a company often a third party appointed by a merchant to handle credit card transactions for merchant acquiring banks. They are usually broken down into two types: Back and Front-End.
Back-End Processors accept settlements from Front-End Processors and, via The Federal Reserve Bank, move the money from the issuing bank to the merchant bank.
Front-End Processors have connections to various card associations and supply authorization and settlement services to the merchant banks’ merchants. In an operation that will usually take a few seconds, the payment processor will both check the details received by forwarding them to the respective card’s issuing bank or card association for verification, and also carry out a series of anti-fraud measures against the transaction.
Additional parameters, including the card’s country of issue and its previous payment history, are also used to gauge the probability of the transaction being approved.
Once the payment processor has received confirmation that the credit card details have been verified, the information will be relayed back via the payment gateway to the merchant, who will then complete the payment transaction. If verification is denied by the card association, the payment processor will relay the information to the merchant, who will then decline the transaction.
Modern Payment Processing
Due to the many regulatory requirements levied on businesses, the modern payment processor is usually partnered with merchants through a concept known as software-as-a-service (SaaS). SaaS payment processors offer a single, regulatory-compliant electronic portal that enables a merchant to scan checks “often called remote deposit capture or RDC”, process single and recurring credit card payments (without the merchant storing the card data at the merchant site), process single and recurring ACH and cash transactions, process remittances and Web payments. These cloud-based features occur regardless of origination through the payment processor’s integrated receivables management platform. This results in cost reductions, accelerated time-to-market, and improved transaction processing quality.
Payment Processing Network Architecture
Typical network architecture for modern online payment systems is a chain of service providers, each providing unique value to the payment transaction, and each adding cost to the transaction. Merchant>Point-of-sale SaaS> Aggregator >Credit Card Network> Bank. The merchant can be a brick-and-mortar outlet or an online outlet. The Point-of-sale (POS) SaaS provider is usually a smaller company that provides customer support to the merchant and is the receiver of the merchant’s transactions. The POS provider represents the Aggregator to merchants. The POS provider transaction volumes are small compared to the Aggregator transaction volumes. The POS provider does not handle enough traffic to warrant a direct connection to the major credit card networks. The merchant also does not handle enough traffic to warrant a direct connection to the Aggregator. In this way, scope and responsibilities are divided among the various business partners to easily manage the technical issues that arise.
Transaction Processing Quality
Electronic payments are highly susceptible to fraud and abuse. Liability to merchants for misuse of credit card data creates a huge expense on merchants, if the business were to attempt mitigation on their own. One way to lower this cost and liability exposure is to segment the transaction of the sale from the payment of the amount due. Some merchants have a requirement to collect money from a customer every month. SaaS Payment Processors relieve the responsibility of the management of recurring payments from the merchant and maintain safe and secure the payment information, passing back to the merchant a payment token. Merchants use this token to actually process a charge which makes the merchant system fully PCI-compliant. Some payment processors also specialize in high-risk processing for industries that are subject to frequent chargebacks, such as adult video distribution.
Posted in Best Practices for Merchants, Credit card Processing, Electronic Check Services, Electronic Payments, Internet Payment Gateway, Merchant Services Account, Payment Card Industry PCI Security, Point of Sale, Visa MasterCard American Express Tagged with: aggregator, aggregator transaction volumes, back end, card associations, card data, chargebacks, credit card transactions, electronic portal, front end, front-end processors, issuing bank, merchant, merchant bank, network architecture, online payment systems, payment gateway, payment processing, payment processor, payment transaction, pci-compliant, point of sale, POS, SAAS
March 17th, 2014 by Elma Jane
Young people and Londoners are leading the way in adopting cashless payments in the U.K., The U.K.-based market research firm also found that non-bank electronic payment methods such as PayPal are trusted more than contactless and mobile card payments.
According to research, 38 percent of British people are interested in being able to make mobile payments and an enthusiastic 8 percent claim they would apply for mobile payment services straight away. Eighteen percent of U.K. Internet users say they would prefer to be able to stop using cash altogether.
Support for a cashless society is strongest in London, with 30 percent prepared to stop using cash. And it is the nation’s youth who are leading the way in new payment forms. Twenty-two percent of those aged 25 to 34 have used Barclays’ Pingit peer-to-peer mobile payment system, compared to 5 percent of those aged 45-54. About 17 percent of 25- to 34-year-olds have used the virtual currency Bitcoin at least once.
However, consumers are more concerned about the security of mobile payments than card payments. Sixty-five percent of consumers showed some concern about mobile payment security and 61 percent showed some concern about contactless cards, compared with 34 percent who were concerned about using debit cards and the 33 percent who were concerned about credit cards.
Consumers were notably less concerned about using non-bank payment services such as PayPal, which protect users’ financial data from being seen by third parties. Only 27 percent of Internet users are concerned about using non-bank payment services such as PayPal.
Posted in Credit card Processing, Credit Card Security, Digital Wallet Privacy, Electronic Payments, EMV EuroPay MasterCard Visa, Mobile Payments, Mobile Point of Sale, Near Field Communication, Smartphone Tagged with: card payments, cashless payments, cashless society, contactless, contactless cards, credit cards, debit cards, electronic payment methods, financial data, internet users, mobile card payments, mobile payment security, mobile payment services, non-bank, non-bank payment services, peer-to-peer mobile payment system, Security, Virtual Currency
March 17th, 2014 by Elma Jane
Lots of talk has gone on since the recent spate of merchant data breaches on ways to potentially prevent hackers from gaining access to stored payment card data. Use of biometric information, such as a fingerprint, to access stored credentials is among the solutions often bandied about.
The prospects of using individuals’ biometric information for credentialing is fairly scary. Security may be what biometrics is trying to achieve, but it’s also its biggest flaw. Imagine having your fingerprint information stored at Target this holiday season, that information would now be in the hands of lots of people not intended to have access to it. Unlike a password, someone can’t change his or her fingerprint. So once someone has the print, they have it forever. So even if something is biometric based, it also has to have a lot of other security measures, and that could include GPS-based location services tied to an individual’s smartphone.
Biometrics alone won’t work. It’s very scary that that information could be stored in a way that someone could figure out how to get it. Even if encrypted, that’s a huge security concern. You can’t change your fingerprint.
Posted in Credit card Processing, Credit Card Security, Electronic Payments, Payment Card Industry PCI Security, Smartphone Tagged with: biometric, card data, credentialing, encrypted, fingerprint, gaining access, gps-based, merchant data breaches, password, prevent hackers, Security, security measures, smartphone, stored credentials
March 14th, 2014 by Elma Jane
Merchant and Consumer Groups Seek Senate Support To Forego EMV Chip and Signature As Breach Concerns Rise
There’s no shortage of answers in trying to put a stop to hackers set on throwing chaos into the way consumers transact at the point of sale, or online for that matter. Yesterday, the Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs subcommittee on national security and international trade and finance got its chance to hear some of them.
During the hearing, William Noonan, deputy special agent in charge, U.S. Secret Service, noted the advances in computer technology and greater access to personally identifiable information online, which have created a virtual marketplace for transnational cyber criminals to share stolen information and criminal methodologies. As a result, the Secret Service has observed a marked increase in the quality, quantity, and complexity of cyber crimes targeting private industry and critical infrastructure. These crimes include network intrusions, hacking attacks, malicious software, and account takeovers leading to significant data breaches affecting every sector of the world economy.
The recently reported data breaches of Target and Neiman Marcus represent only the most recent, well-publicized examples of this decade-long trend of major data breaches perpetrated by cyber criminals intent on targeting the nation’s retailers and financial payment systems. The increasing level of collaboration among cyber-criminals allows them to compartmentalize their operations, greatly increasing the sophistication of their criminal endeavors and allowing for development of expert specialization. These specialties raise both the complexity of investigating these cases, as well as the level of potential harm to companies and individuals.
So how should the industry react to prevent further breaches? Those opinions provided during testimony at the hearing varied widely, though both consumer and merchant groups would like the card networks to give up requiring only signatures for smart card purchases at the point of sale.
Consumer program director at the U.S. Public Interest Research Group, called for myriad of changes, citing that the greater risk from the recent breaches is less related to identity theft than it is to fraud on existing accounts, and he said it’s time for players on both sides of the transaction to focus more on protecting consumers than on managing their own risk.
Until now, both banks and merchants have looked at fraud and identity theft as a modest cost of doing business and have not protected the payment system well enough. They have failed to look seriously at harms to their customers from fraud and identity theft -including not just monetary losses and the hassles of restoring their good names, but also the emotional harm that they must face as they wonder whether future credit applications will be rejected due to the fraudulent accounts.
As a first step, Congress should institute the same fraud cap, $50, on debit/ATM cards that exists on credit cards, or eliminate the $50 cap entirely, since it is never imposed because of the zero-liability policies issuers have voluntarily have imposed. Congress also should provide debit and prepaid card customers with the stronger billing-dispute rights and rights to dispute payment for products that do not arrive or do not work as promised, just as many credit card users enjoy.
Congress should endorse a specific technology, such as EMV smart cards and if it does, require the use of PINs when initiating smart card transactions. The current pending U.S. rollout of chip cards will allow use of the less-secure chip-and-signature cards rather than the more-secure chip-and-PIN cards. Why not go to the higher-and-PIN authentication standard immediately and skip past chip and signature? There is still time to make this improvement.”
Retailers have spent billions of dollars on card-security measures and upgrades to comply with PCI card security requirements, but it hasn’t made them immune to data breaches and fraud. The card networks have made those decisions for merchants, and the increases in fraud demonstrate that their decisions have not been as effective as they should have been.
The card networks should forego chip and signature and go straight to chip and PIN. To do otherwise would mean that merchants would spend billions to install new card readers without they or their customers obtaining PINs’ fraud-reducing benefits. We would essentially be spending billions to combine a 1990’s technology chips with a 1960’s relic signature in the face of 21st century threats.
Posted in Best Practices for Merchants, Credit card Processing, Credit Card Reader Terminal, Credit Card Security, Digital Wallet Privacy, Electronic Payments, EMV EuroPay MasterCard Visa, Financial Services, Merchant Services Account, Payment Card Industry PCI Security, Point of Sale, Small Business Improvement, Visa MasterCard American Express Tagged with: banking, Breach, card networks, card-security, chip and signature, chip cards, chip-and-PIN cards, computer technology, credit applications, credit cards, critical infrastructure, cyber crimes, cyber-criminals, data breaches, debit atm cards, EMV, hackers, hacking attacks, international trade and finance, malicious software, managing risk, merchant, national security, netwrok intrusions, new card readers, online, payment system, pci card security requirements, PIN, point of sale, prepaid card customers, smart card transactions, technology chips, the secret service, transnational cyber criminals, virtual marketplace, world economy
March 6th, 2014 by Elma Jane
MPOS Mobile Point-of-sale.
Mobile point-of-sale is evolving as more merchants and consumers begin to accept payment through smartphones and tablets. The end of 2013 saw a number of acquisitions and new players shape the market, and all the signs are pointing to 2014 as the year in which MPOS goes mainstream.
Indeed, 2014 should be a defining year for MPOS. Data contained in the most recent MPOS Tracker as an indication that the major players are moving seriously to capture market share, educate merchants on the benefits of MPOS and work to make interaction with the systems simpler for consumers.
Existing companies bringing out new platform enhancement, new players popping in, partnership made it was more active, and it’s been very active in the past. This technology is going in the market, and where this industry is headed is upmarket and globalization. In order for each of these things to happen, it’s much more about the application programming interfaces and the platform that enables than the actual app itself.
A critical trend this year is global expansion outside of the U.S. This growth will help promote MPOS and push it into the mainstream as a vehicle for payment.
More adoption happening as major retailers start to integrate MPOS into their existing systems. Over time, consumers will start to use their mobile devices to make payments more frequently.
In the past, most of the activity has been in the small and midsize business space in the U.S. A lot of the use cases were niche markets, as this technology moves up to major retailers, it will become more visible to consumers that it’s not just a niche application, but it’s a regular, day-to-date encounter for them to run into MPOS.
As for the future, the signs point to continued growth both in terms of new players appearing and in market consolidation among the smaller players. However, some will have a tougher time than others as new MPOS companies seek both market share and relevance in the wider ecosystem.
Posted in Best Practices for Merchants, Credit card Processing, Credit Card Reader Terminal, e-commerce & m-commerce, Electronic Payments, Internet Payment Gateway, Merchant Services Account, Mobile Payments, Mobile Point of Sale, Point of Sale, Small Business Improvement, Smartphone, Visa MasterCard American Express Tagged with: accept payment, app, application programming interfaces, integrate mpos, major retailers, make payments, Merchant's, Mobile Devices, mobile point of sale, MPOS, platform, Smartphones, tablets
March 3rd, 2014 by Elma Jane
Interchange is a word that’s talked about a lot in the payments industry. If you didn’t have to pay interchange fees, what would your business spend the money on? At its most basic, interchange is the fees businesses pay to credit card processors to swipe your credit and get paid – or the cost of moving money. Businesses are sick and tired of paying high fees and getting very little in return. Customers are sick and tired of seeing prices of items tick upwards as businesses are forced to charge more to cover the cost of interchange.
Businesses spend an exorbitant amount of money each year to accept credit cards – to the tune of $50B. Businesses could reinvest the money they’ve been spending on interchange to better connect with customers, enhance marketing initiatives and grow faster and smarter. Just imagine for a second the economic stimulus the country would get if all that money was put back into the business to drive growth, or back into the pockets of customers to lower costs.
In the past 30 years, interchange fees have mainly gone in only one direction: up. Luckily, things are starting to change, and I think we’re going to start seeing interchange being driven down. The days of a 3 -or 4-percent interchange rate are beginning to look numbered and here’s why:
Competition
There are nearly 200 players in the mobile payments space, with more entering daily. New opportunities are providing businesses with alternative payment options that are outside of Mastercard and Visa’s clutches. While there might be 1,000-plus credit card processing companies, they’re all based on the Mastercard/Visa rails, which provides a fixed floor. But not so with many of these new payment options. As such, traditional methods of payment (cash, credit cards) are facing an increasing amount of competition, and merchants are starting to pay attention.
It’s unlikely that cash and credit cards are going away anytime soon, but it only takes a small shift in volume (maybe 5 percent) for the card issuers to start paying attention. There are a number of ways for them to react, but if history is any guide, one of them will be to start lowering their prices. Alternatively, they could find ways to offer more value to their merchants. Either way, competition is offering merchants new ways to accept payments, and this will lower fees over time.
Innovation
The second thing driving down costs for merchants is rapid innovation, and like a good deal of innovation these days, much of it is centered around mobile. Mobile payments are starting to gain significant traction among consumers, accounting for $640M in 2012 and expected to have grown by an additional 234 percent in 2013.
QR codes, NFC, peer-to-peer payments, card emulation – the list of new technologies trying to disrupt the payments space goes on and on. These new alternatives are challenging the current payments system and shedding light on the opportunities for businesses. This innovation is beneficial in two ways. The first, as discussed above is that more competition will naturally drive costs down. The second is that alternative payment options are focusing on value beyond the transaction.
There are new payment options out there that provide tangible information, such as data analytics, which help companies drive sales and increase revenues. New options are allowing small businesses access to the same technology and analytics that were previously reserved for big-box retailers or e-commerce sites only. These additional value propositions not only help businesses, they also provide new ways for payments companies to monetize, removing the need for them to make all of their money from interchange. With two (or more) revenue lines, lowering interchange is suddenly a lot more feasible.
Legislation
The Durbin Amendment is designed to introduce competition in the debit card processing network and limit fees for businesses. For all of its unintended consequences, Durbin legislation is actually helping to drive down interchange; it’s opening up competition for non-card-brand network players and lowering debit card fees. While it is certainly rife with controversy, this amendment is opening up new ways to move money that will, over time, contribute to a less expensive payment processing ecosystem.
Merchant demand
Business owners are smart and savvy. They pay attention to trends, focusing on finding new ways to set their business apart. Business owners are also conscious of ROI, and how much they’re spending to attract and retain customers. They understand there is some cost to accept payments, but are becoming more and more frustrated at the high swipe fee costs from traditional credit card processors and minimal return for those fees.
Businesses are looking to new, innovative solutions to provide more than just payment processing – they want to understand and better connect with their customers. In short, merchants are ready for a new payments ecosystem, and where there’s this much demand from a group this big and influential, a solution can’t stay away for too long.
Interchange rates are not going away entirely in the near future, although it will happen eventually. A lot of powerful wheels are in motion to significantly reduce the interchange rates that merchants currently pay. Right now the impact might be small, but it’s growing quickly. In a few years, 3- to 4-percent interchange could be relegated to the same bit of history as $1.99 international phone calls.
Posted in Credit card Processing, Electronic Payments, Financial Services, Gift & Loyalty Card Processing, Internet Payment Gateway, Small Business Improvement Tagged with: accept credit cards, accept payments, alternative payment, credit card processing, credit card processors, credit cards, debit card processing network, e-commerce, interchange, interchange fees, interchange rates, lowering debit card fees, lowering interchange, Merchant's, Mobile Payments, payment processing, payments, payments industry, swipe your credit card
March 3rd, 2014 by Elma Jane
A solution for mobile commerce will be needed eventually, whether you’re an ecommerce merchant or you run a brick-and-mortar shop.
There are mobile payment platforms for digital wallets, smartphone apps with card-reader attachments, and services that provide alternative billing options. Here is a list of mobile payment solutions.
Boku enables your customers to charge their purchases directly to their mobile bill using just their mobile number. No credit card information, bank accounts or registration required. The Boku payment option can be added to a website, mobile site, or app. Price: Contact Boku for pricing.
Intuit GoPayment is a mobile credit card processing app from Intuit. It accepts all credit cards and can record cash or check payments. Intuit GoPayment transactions sync with QuickBooks and Intuit point-of-sale products. Intuit GoPayment works with iOS and Android devices and provides a free reader. Price: $12.95 per month and 1.75 percent per swipe, or 2.75 percent per swipe and 3.75 per keyed transaction.
iPayment MobilePay is a mobile payment solution from Flagship Merchant Services and ROAMpay. The service accepts all major cards and can record cash transactions. To help build your customer database, the app completes customer address fields for published landlines. The app can handle taxes, tips, and can record transactions offline. You can use the service month-to-month. The app and the reader are free. Price: $7.95 per month; Each transaction costs $0.19 plus a swipe fee maximum of 1.58 percent, or a key fee between 1.36 and 2.56 percent.
ISIS mobile commerce platform enables brick-and-mortar stores to collect payments (via an NFC terminal) from the mobile devices of their customers. Provide your customers with a simplified checkout process through the contactless transmission of payments, offers, and loyalty integrated in one simple tap. Price: Isis does not charge for payment transactions in the Isis Mobile Wallet. Payment transaction fees will not be increased by working with Isis.
LevelUp is mobile payment system that uses QR codes on smartphones to process transactions. Use LevelUp with a scanner through your POS system, or use a standalone scanner with a mobile device. You can also enter the transaction through the LevelUp Merchant App, using your smartphone’s camera to read the customer’s QR Code and entering the amount to complete the transaction. LevelUp also provides tools to utilize customer data. Price: LevelUp charges a 2 percent per transaction fee. Scanner is $50; tablet is $200.
MCX is a mobile application in development by a group of large retail merchants. Details on the solution are vague, but MCX is intended to offer a customizable platform that will be available through virtually any smartphone. MCX’s owner-members include a list of merchants in the big-box, convenience, drug, fuel, grocery, quick- and full-service dining, specialty-retail, and travel categories. Price: To be determined.
mPowa is a mobile payment app to process credit and debit card transactions, and record cash and check sales. mPowa will soon launch its PowaPIN chip and PIN reader for the EMV (“Europay, MasterCard, and Visa”) card standard. (Developed in Europe, EMV utilizes a chip embedded in a credit card, rather than a magnetic strip.) The EMV standard is likely to gain footing to combat credit card fraud. mPowa is a good solution for merchants with a global presence. Price: 2.95 percent per transactions, or .25 percent or $0.40 per transaction when used as a current processor’s point-of-sale system.
PayAnywhere is a solution to accept payments from your smartphone or tablet with a reader. It features an automatic tax calculation based on your current location, discounts and tips, inventories with product images and data, and more. Bilingual for English and Spanish users. PayAnywhere provides a free credit card reader and free app, available for iOS and Android. Price: 2.69 percent per swipe, 3.49 percent plus $0.19 per keyed transaction.
PayPal Here gives you a variety of options for accepting payments, including credit cards, PayPal, check, record cash payments, or invoice. With PayPal Here, you can itemize sales totals, calculate tax, offer discounts, accept tips, and manage payment email notifications. Available for iOS and Android. The app and reader are free. Price: 2.75 percent per swipe and 3.5 percent plus $0.15 per manually-entered transaction.
Square is a simple approach to mobile credit card processing. Square provides a free point of sale app and a free credit card reader for iPhones and iPads. Square offers a selection of tools to track sales, taxes, top-purchasing customers, and more. Square’s pricing is on the higher end, but with no monthly fee Square may be a good fit if you have infrequent mobile transactions. Price: 2.75 percent per swipe and 3.5 percent plus $0.15 per manually-entered transaction.
Posted in Credit card Processing, Credit Card Reader Terminal, Credit Card Security, Digital Wallet Privacy, e-commerce & m-commerce, Electronic Check Services, Electronic Payments, EMV EuroPay MasterCard Visa, Financial Services, Internet Payment Gateway, Mail Order Telephone Order, Mobile Payments, Mobile Point of Sale, Near Field Communication, Point of Sale, Small Business Improvement, Smartphone, Visa MasterCard American Express Tagged with: accepts all credit cards, alternative billing, Android, bank accounts, brick and mortar, check payments, contactless transmission, credit and debit transactions, credit card reader, credit-card, database, Digital wallets, ecommerce merchant, EMV, free app, iOS, itemize, keyed transaction, mobile commerce, mobile credit card processing, mobile payment platforms, mobile site, mobile transactions, nfc terminal, point of sale, process transactions, qr codes, record transactions offline, smartphone apps card-reader attachments, transactions
February 24th, 2014 by Elma Jane
When someone asks what business you are in, how do you typically respond?
For many online sellers, the answer is likely I sell (name of the product), I’m an ecommerce merchant or I’m an online retailer.
Make the focus of your business your customers and its value proposition, not the fact that you sell online. It’s time to simply answer the question of what business you are in with a response that is more or less, “I am a (distributor, retailer, reseller) of (name your products) for (name your market).”
Back then, most business owners who sold products online described themselves as “ecommerce businesses” or “online retailers,” to differentiate from brick-and-mortar or catalog retailers. Most operated their own pure-play online stores. Some sold products on eBay. Amazon’s marketplace was mostly comprised of larger retailers. There’s an evolution in how e-commerce owners describe themselves.
Today, you will still hear many online sellers describe themselves as “ecommerce businesses” or “online retailers.” But, in 2014, those terms don’t really apply. Whatever you sell, you are delivering a set of products to meet the needs of a specific market. “Ecommerce” or “online retailing” is simply a technology and a sales channel.
There is now no difference between “ecommerce” and “commerce.” It’s time to get rid of the “e” in ecommerce. Most businesses participate in ecommerce in some fashion. You engage your customers in many different channels — your own e-commerce site, brick-and-mortar, online marketplaces. Regardless, you and virtually every other B-to-C or B-to-B company are selling goods to customers across those channels.
Why Worry about Labels?
Today, commerce is multichannel and highly competitive. It’s done online, on the phone, face-to-face, and on desktop, mobile, and tablet devices. Make sure your business has an omnichannel strategy, so your shoppers can find you. Make sure the information about your company and products is consistent regardless of the channel. Focus on whom your prospective customers are, what they want to buy, and how much they are willing to pay.
Business owners should think strategically. Part of strategic thinking is focusing on the bigger picture, such as having the right products and ensuring that your buyers can find them.
Omnichannel Focus
Think about omnichannel commerce every day. Get your brand and products in front of your target customers regardless of where they are shopping. Below are some things to consider to facilitate an omnichannel strategy.
Chat and phone. If you don’t offer online chat or take phone orders, consider doing so.
Marketplaces. If you aren’t selling your products in marketplaces outside of your own online store, consider doing so.
Mobile. If you don’t have a mobile strategy, you need one.
Payment options. If you only take credit cards for payments on your website, add alternative payments like PayPal, Google Wallet, or Amazon Payments.
Social media. If you don’t have a social media presence, your market share is likely declining.
Customer Focus
Twenty-five years ago, if you asked a brick-and-mortar retailer or a catalog vendor what business she was in, she would likely respond as, say, “jewelry retailer,” “men’s clothing store,” “a department store,” or “hardware store.” She knew her target customer niche, how to reach them, and what products they wanted to buy. Those businesses that did the best job of (a) matching products to the consumer, (b) offering low prices, and (c) utilizing the right distribution likely won most of the business.
It’s time to get back to that focus. It’s more challenging than it used to be because the purchase cycles are far more complex than in 2002. There is no longer a straight path from identifying the need to research to purchase. Consumers typically identify a need and purchase intent, research products, research prices, research products further, conduct social media research, and then purchase a product and demand instant gratification and free shipping.
To be successful in 2014, commerce – not just ecommerce – requires the following.
Emphasize your value proposition. Regardless of how a shopper finds you, be sure he can quickly find out that you are a leading retailer of products in your market. Being clear on what your business is will also help establish trust with your shoppers.
Execute the 4 Ps of sales and marketing – “product,” “price,” “promotion,” and “place.”
First, make sure you know your target customers and what problems they are trying to solve or the need that you fulfill with your products. Know their demographics, their buying cycles, price tolerance, and where they research and shop.
Know your competitors.
Posted in Credit card Processing, Digital Wallet Privacy, e-commerce & m-commerce, Electronic Payments, Internet Payment Gateway, Mail Order Telephone Order, Mobile Payments, Small Business Improvement, Smartphone Tagged with: alternative payments, Amazon, brick and mortar, catalog retailers, catalog vendor, commerce, credit cards for payments, e-commerce site, ebay, ecommerce, ecommerce merchant, mobile and tablet devices, omnichannel, omnichannel commerce, online retailer, online sellers, online stores, phone orders, sales channel, sell online
February 21st, 2014 by Elma Jane
NationalTransaction.com QR Code
Emerging economies, such as the BRIC countries and the next layer of emerging markets, are seeing particularly fast growth of alternative payments, said Kevin Dallas, chief product and marketing officer for e-commerce at WorldPay. This means the complexity of the payment landscape will increase further. Merchants will need to ensure they understand diverging regional and sector trends in preferred methods of payment.
In three years alternative payments will eclipse credit card payments as the dominant way to pay online, according to a report yesterday from London-based e-commerce processor WorldPay. In Your Global Guide to Alternative Payments (Second Edition), WorldPay found card payments online, which accounted for 57 percent of transactions in 2012, will fall to 41 percent in 2017. Alternative payment methods (defined by the report as anything other than credit or debit cards including bank transfers, direct debits, e-wallets, mobile, COD and others) will rise to 59 percent of online transactions in the next three years. Part of the reason is the preferred payment methods in some of the fastest growing e-commerce markets are not cards.
The report predicts e-wallet transactions alone will equal the number of credit card transactions online at 41 percent, becoming the most popular method of paying online globally by 2017. Currently, PayPal is the most popular alternative payment method in the world with a market share of 57 percent. China’s Alipay is second at 20 percent.
Posted in Credit card Processing, Digital Wallet Privacy, e-commerce & m-commerce, Electronic Payments, Internet Payment Gateway, Mobile Payments, Mobile Point of Sale, Near Field Communication, Visa MasterCard American Express Tagged with: alternative payments, bank transfers, card payments online, cod, credit card payments, credit card transactions, debit cards, direct debits, e-commerce, e-commerce processor, e-wallet transactions, e-wallets, methods of payment, mobile, online transactions, pay online, paying online, payment, PayPal, transactions
