April 18th, 2014 by Elma Jane
Capital One joins existing stakeholders equally owned by Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, and Wells Fargo. Member-owner of the ClearXchange network.
Capital One has taken a stake in ClearXchange, the US bank-backed clearing house for person-to-person online payments transfer.
ClearXchange is the first network in the U.S. created by banks that lets customers send and receive (P2P) person-to-person payments easily and securely using an email address or mobile number.
With only the recipient’s mobile number or email address, the ClearXchange network enables customers to send funds directly from their bank account to the recipient’s bank account without the need to pass on more sensitive account information.
EVP of digital at Capital One, says partnering with clearXchange is another way of bringing safe and secure payments through convenient, digital channels to their customers.
With membership open to banks and credit unions of all sizes, ClearXchange has so far signed up only FirstBank as its sole non-owner participant, although it nonetheless claims to represent more than 50 percent of the consumer online banking market.
Posted in Credit card Processing, Electronic Payments, Merchant Services Account, Mobile Payments, Payment Card Industry PCI Security, Small Business Improvement, Smartphone, Visa MasterCard American Express Tagged with: account, bank account, Bank of America, Capital One, consumer online banking, digital channels, JP Morgan, market, mobile, online payments transfer, p2p, payments, person-to-person, secure payments, securely, U.S. Bank, US Bank, Wells Fargo
April 11th, 2014 by Elma Jane
A new standard that uses Host Card Emulation (HCE) was introduced by VISA to enable financial institutions to securely host Visa accounts in the cloud. Visa’s move to support HCE includes tools and services as well as the standard. It is available now and will include support for QR codes and in-app payments in the future.
With this new service and platform that Visa is developing, it will enable clients and partners to issue Visa accounts digitally in the cloud, on secure elements in smartphones, or linked to a digital wallet. The solution will also enable the issuance of payment tokens that will replace the 16-digit payment account number and can be limited for use with a specific device, merchant or payment channel.
Layers of security will deploy by Visa to protect payment accounts in the cloud, including at the Visa network, application and hardware levels. Device fingerprinting technology, one-time use data, payment tokens and real-time transaction analysis will make up a multi-layered defense against unauthorized account access for their services.
Visa has intensified its Visa PayWave contactless payment application and is introducing a new implementation guidelines, program approval process standard and requirements for their standards.
Visa is also developing a tool, its software development kit (SDK) to support clients who wish to develop their own cloud-based payment applications or want to enhance their existing mobile banking applications with Visa PayWave functionality.
HCE is introduced to make it easier for developers to create NFC applications like mobile payments, loyalty programs, transit passes, and other custom services. Visa’s move to enable NFC payments with Android devices is welcome news and will guide the way for the payments industry.
Clients and partners around the globe are continuously looking for cost efficient, flexible and secure ways to enable mobile payments. The Android HCE feature provides with a platform to evolve the Visa PayWave standard, support the development of secure, cloud-based mobile applications, while at the same time offer greater choice.
Posted in Best Practices for Merchants, Credit card Processing, Credit Card Security, Electronic Payments, Financial Services, Merchant Services Account, Mobile Payments, Mobile Point of Sale, Near Field Communication, Smartphone Tagged with: accounts, android devices, approval, cloud, cloud-based mobile applications, contactless payment, device fingerprinting, Digital Wallet, digitally, financial institutions, HCE, host card emulation, in-app, mobile banking, nfc, payment account number, payment channel, payment tokens, payments, qr codes, real-time transaction, secure elements, securely, Smartphones, unauthorized, visa, visa network
March 31st, 2014 by Elma Jane
Money remittance companies can achieve real benefits by embracing a mobile-first strategy. In fact, when it comes to financial institutions, I can definitely say this is a perfect match! Specially for us who are transferring money to our home country for our loved ones.
Here are some factors why.
It decentralizes transaction points, making it inherently safer for customers.
People carrying cash in and out of remittance centers are prime targets for criminals. In some countries, it’s not rare to have people mugged just outside of banks and remittance centers.
By allowing people to transact wherever they are, mobile remittance decentralizes the transaction points, making it harder for thieves to find unsuspecting prey.
It has the potential to reduce bottlenecks in branches.
Mobile remittance can reduce the number of people who would visit a remittance branch to complete transactions. It alleviates traffic inside the branch, reducing lines and wait times and making visits by other customers more hassle-free.
Makes remittances more accessible.
The reduction in costs of running a remittance operation means these companies can actually lower the costs of sending money for the end-customer. This makes remittances more accessible to the areas that most need it, such as developing nations and remote rural areas. Lower costs also make it more attractive for people to use formal remittance solutions to send over money. For the poor, every cent counts, so lower costs can make the added security only a financial institution can provide more attractive for them.
Mobile makes money transfers faster and more convenient.
While today’s contactless mobile payments solutions are still not as simple as handing over a wad of cash or swiping a card for over-the-counter payments, in the world of money remittances, mobile can actually smooth out friction points.
Through mobile, senders can send funds wherever they are. They won’t have to drive or commute to a local remittance center, they don’t have to fill out forms and they don’t have to fall in line to complete the transaction. It’s all seamless and convenient.
For the recipients, mobile remittance can save them the trouble of having to go to a remittance center, fill out a form and fall in line to receive their money. All they’ll need is a simple SMS code that they can use to withdraw funds from a nearby ATM through cardless transactions.
Money can stay within the remittance company’s network longer.
One of the side effects of successful mobile money campaigns is that users are also using these mobile money solutions as storage mediums for their money. They don’t withdraw the funds all in one go. Instead, they only take out what they need and withdraw funds later.
Having the ability to withdraw small sums at a time has multiple benefits. For one, carrying less cash makes it safer for the customer. For the remittance company, the money stays in its network longer.
Opens up doors for financial inclusion
This is particularly true for developing countries where a vast majority of the population are un-banked or under-banked. The costs of building and maintaining a physical presence in poor countries has made traditional financial services difficult to access for their citizens. Even in poor countries, a large number of the population has access to a mobile device, giving them an opportunity to receive financial services.
Opens up other opportunities for remittance companies
Having a mobile service can help remittance companies expand to other services. They can add bill payments into the app, for example, allowing their customers to pay for utility bills using funds sent to them through their mobile devices.
Paves the way forward to progress
Mobile use is so widespread that it is no longer wise for remittance companies to turn a blind eye to it. If they won’t embrace it, you can bet their competitors will. Whoever gains traction in the mobile channel will have a huge advantage in the market. It’s now a case of move now or be left behind.
Reduces costs for remittance companies
Mobile remittance can cut costs for remittance companies by reducing the need for physical branches and personnel to accommodate walk-in clients. Mobile can scale without incurring significant costs making a mobile investment much better in the long-term for remittance companies that want to expand their operations.
Posted in Best Practices for Merchants, Financial Services, Mobile Payments, Small Business Improvement, Smartphone Tagged with: atm, bill payments, cardless transactions, complete the transaction, contactless mobile payments, financial services, mobile channel, mobile device, mobile money, mobile remittance, mobile service, mobile-first, money remittance, network, payments, sms, swiping a card, transaction, transferring money
March 3rd, 2014 by Elma Jane
Interchange is a word that’s talked about a lot in the payments industry. If you didn’t have to pay interchange fees, what would your business spend the money on? At its most basic, interchange is the fees businesses pay to credit card processors to swipe your credit and get paid – or the cost of moving money. Businesses are sick and tired of paying high fees and getting very little in return. Customers are sick and tired of seeing prices of items tick upwards as businesses are forced to charge more to cover the cost of interchange.
Businesses spend an exorbitant amount of money each year to accept credit cards – to the tune of $50B. Businesses could reinvest the money they’ve been spending on interchange to better connect with customers, enhance marketing initiatives and grow faster and smarter. Just imagine for a second the economic stimulus the country would get if all that money was put back into the business to drive growth, or back into the pockets of customers to lower costs.
In the past 30 years, interchange fees have mainly gone in only one direction: up. Luckily, things are starting to change, and I think we’re going to start seeing interchange being driven down. The days of a 3 -or 4-percent interchange rate are beginning to look numbered and here’s why:
Competition
There are nearly 200 players in the mobile payments space, with more entering daily. New opportunities are providing businesses with alternative payment options that are outside of Mastercard and Visa’s clutches. While there might be 1,000-plus credit card processing companies, they’re all based on the Mastercard/Visa rails, which provides a fixed floor. But not so with many of these new payment options. As such, traditional methods of payment (cash, credit cards) are facing an increasing amount of competition, and merchants are starting to pay attention.
It’s unlikely that cash and credit cards are going away anytime soon, but it only takes a small shift in volume (maybe 5 percent) for the card issuers to start paying attention. There are a number of ways for them to react, but if history is any guide, one of them will be to start lowering their prices. Alternatively, they could find ways to offer more value to their merchants. Either way, competition is offering merchants new ways to accept payments, and this will lower fees over time.
Innovation
The second thing driving down costs for merchants is rapid innovation, and like a good deal of innovation these days, much of it is centered around mobile. Mobile payments are starting to gain significant traction among consumers, accounting for $640M in 2012 and expected to have grown by an additional 234 percent in 2013.
QR codes, NFC, peer-to-peer payments, card emulation – the list of new technologies trying to disrupt the payments space goes on and on. These new alternatives are challenging the current payments system and shedding light on the opportunities for businesses. This innovation is beneficial in two ways. The first, as discussed above is that more competition will naturally drive costs down. The second is that alternative payment options are focusing on value beyond the transaction.
There are new payment options out there that provide tangible information, such as data analytics, which help companies drive sales and increase revenues. New options are allowing small businesses access to the same technology and analytics that were previously reserved for big-box retailers or e-commerce sites only. These additional value propositions not only help businesses, they also provide new ways for payments companies to monetize, removing the need for them to make all of their money from interchange. With two (or more) revenue lines, lowering interchange is suddenly a lot more feasible.
Legislation
The Durbin Amendment is designed to introduce competition in the debit card processing network and limit fees for businesses. For all of its unintended consequences, Durbin legislation is actually helping to drive down interchange; it’s opening up competition for non-card-brand network players and lowering debit card fees. While it is certainly rife with controversy, this amendment is opening up new ways to move money that will, over time, contribute to a less expensive payment processing ecosystem.
Merchant demand
Business owners are smart and savvy. They pay attention to trends, focusing on finding new ways to set their business apart. Business owners are also conscious of ROI, and how much they’re spending to attract and retain customers. They understand there is some cost to accept payments, but are becoming more and more frustrated at the high swipe fee costs from traditional credit card processors and minimal return for those fees.
Businesses are looking to new, innovative solutions to provide more than just payment processing – they want to understand and better connect with their customers. In short, merchants are ready for a new payments ecosystem, and where there’s this much demand from a group this big and influential, a solution can’t stay away for too long.
Interchange rates are not going away entirely in the near future, although it will happen eventually. A lot of powerful wheels are in motion to significantly reduce the interchange rates that merchants currently pay. Right now the impact might be small, but it’s growing quickly. In a few years, 3- to 4-percent interchange could be relegated to the same bit of history as $1.99 international phone calls.
Posted in Credit card Processing, Electronic Payments, Financial Services, Gift & Loyalty Card Processing, Internet Payment Gateway, Small Business Improvement Tagged with: accept credit cards, accept payments, alternative payment, credit card processing, credit card processors, credit cards, debit card processing network, e-commerce, interchange, interchange fees, interchange rates, lowering debit card fees, lowering interchange, Merchant's, Mobile Payments, payment processing, payments, payments industry, swipe your credit card
January 13th, 2014 by Elma Jane
Australia & New Zealand Banking Group plans to use voice biometrics for authorizing large-value transfers to external bank accounts via its mobile banking service.
The Australian newspaper said ANZ is still piloting the voice biometrics feature, which would enable its mobile banking customers to make payments of more than A$1,000 ($910 U.S.)… The current limit for external transfers to clients of other banks using its smartphone app. Customers would authorize a higher-value payment by speaking into their smartphones, and ANZ’s IT system would compare their voices to digital voiceprints stored on its server.
The voice biometrics system will likely be launched within the next 12 to 18 months, Phil Chronican, the chief executive of ANZ’s Australia operation, said during a Sydney press conference last week.
Chronican added that ANZ also plans to use voice biometrics for authenticating transactions initiated at its call centers.
ANZ will launch the revamped mobile apps that it has been developing as part of the “Banking on Australia” initiative in the first quarter of 2014.
ANZ’s three-year old GoMoney mobile banking app and its more recent FastPay small business mobile payments service will both be re-released with new navigation and personalization options, iTNews said.
Posted in Credit card Processing, Credit Card Security, Mobile Payments, Smartphone Tagged with: authenticating, authorize, authorizing, biometrics, digital, mobile banking, Mobile Payments, mobile transactions, payments, personalization, smartphone app, transactions
January 3rd, 2014 by Elma Jane
Results of a new survey on overall mobile use by consumers has several ramifications for payments using mobile devices. The report, from global management consultancy Deloitte, found the number of consumers who said their device is NFC-equipped more than doubled from 2012 to 2013. More importantly perhaps, for a technology many observers have pronounced dead and buried, of those whose devices are equipped with NFC technology, more than one-third said they have made a contactless payment using their phone in the past month.
The report also found that the number of app downloads decreased 13 percent this year in the U.S. and even more in other countries. Per-app spending also decreased during the year, but the report’s authors still believe the outlook for apps is positive.
The good news is, we see a lot of potential remaining in the apps market space over the long term. We believe that the overall declines indicated in this year’s survey may be due to increasing sophistication among consumers. It is likely that they have already obtained the core apps they prefer for work and play, with those choices persisting over time as they upgrade and change their devices said Craig Wigginton, vice chairman and U.S. telecommunications sector leader for Deloitte.
Posted in Credit card Processing, Electronic Payments, Environmentally Green, Mobile Payments, Near Field Communication, Smartphone Tagged with: apps, contactless, devices, equipped, mobile, nfc, outlook, payments, Per-app, phone, report, technology, upgrade
December 30th, 2013 by Elma Jane
Google
With New Debit Card, Google Admits Digital Isn’t Everything
The maker of all things digital is introducing a debit card for accessing Google Wallet accounts. Google is getting physical.
A debit card alone is not a platform, or at least not a new one. In this case, it’s the payments version of comfort food: an everyday, easy-to-use technology to drive greater adoption of the less familiar Wallet platform.
This isn’t a new concept for a digital wallet. PayPal itself has a debit card. The significance for Google is more in its apparent acknowledgment that its business needs to play in the physical world. Earlier this week, the company ramped up its Google Shopping Express service with a partnership with Costco, further expanding its presence in the buying and selling of physical goods. Its self-driving cars are another way the company is reaching beyond digital, though never losing sight of the digital-derived lesson that the real business opportunity is in platforms, not just products.
The MasterCard-branded card is swipe-able at stores, and it can be used to withdraw cash at ATMs, Google said. The company pitched its new plastic in a blog post today as a way to pay for things offline without waiting for the money in your Google Wallet to transfer to a bank account.
This should sound familiar to users of PayPal or any other digital wallet, where the lag time between receiving money and being able to spend it makes such services marginal in the brick-and-mortar world, where most consumer dollars get spent.
That it took Google this long to make such a card available shows just how hard it is for the company to re-imagine itself as expanding beyond digital. For years, Google has supported NFC tap-to-pay technology that lets users of the few phones with such chips use their handsets to pay by Wallet at the few merchants with point-of-sale systems that support NFC. With the release of a debit card, Google seems to be acknowledging that battle is lost for now. In a world Google is trying to remake in its digital-first image, plastic still prevails.
Posted in Digital Wallet Privacy, Mobile Payments, Mobile Point of Sale, Near Field Communication, Point of Sale, Smartphone Tagged with: brick and mortar, costco, debit card, digital, handsets, MasterCard, nfc, payments, PayPal, phones, plastic, platform, point of sale, Tap to Pay, wallet
December 30th, 2013 by Elma Jane
Alternative Payments and Ecommerce Conversions
There’s no shortage of alternative payment choices: eBay’s PayPal, Google’s Wallet, Visa V.me, and MasterCard MasterPass, to name a few. There is also a proliferation of alternate contenders, as mobile shopping threatens to disrupt traditional methods of payments.
Alternative payment companies each claim that their payment method increases conversions. My company, SeeWhy, performed an independent analysis and confirmed these claims.
In this study data shows significant increases in conversion compared with credit cards, peaking at a 101 percent increase on smartphones.
But this is not the whole story. While these increases are impressive, they only applied to around 15 percent of traffic, so the impact on your site’s overall conversion rate will be much less. Depending on the characteristics of your site you will probably see somewhere in the region of 5 to 10 percent improvement in your site’s overall conversion rate, which is still significant enough not to be ignored. As mobile commerce grows, then alternative payments will become ever more important.
However, before embarking on an alternative payment implementation, there are three important considerations you need to take into account.
1. How Many Alternative Payment Methods?
Choosing only one alternative payment method might be tough, so why not implement several, and cover the market more thoroughly? This may be a valid approach, but think carefully before choosing this option.
For example, RunningShoes.com has implemented PayPal, Google Wallet, and MasterPass as alternative payment options.
The problem is that offering payment choices can create four different competing calls-to-action, as you can see. Whenever consumers are faced with too much choice, indecision tends to follow.
This is also problematic when you consider the whole page. There are lots of visual distractions to the primary call to action, which in this case is the red Secure Checkout button.
Before embarking on implementing multiple calls-to-action, consider how you are going to solve this issue. One route you could consider is to suppress the alternate payment methods for returning customers if the customer always pays by credit card, for example. Or if the customer always purchases by PayPal, show the PayPal button most prominently, and hide the others under a Show alternate methods of payment link.
2. How to Implement
Not all sites will see significant increases in conversion when implementing alternate payment methods. The main reason for this is that implementations can be done badly. One of the primary benefits of these payment methods is that they enable visitors to bypass the billing, shipping, and card entry steps on an ecommerce site. This is especially important for mobile sites, where entering these details using fingers and small screens defeats all but the most determined.
However, many sites implement these payment methods as an alternative only to entering the credit card number. You can see this here on Barnes and Noble ‘s site, where you are forced to enter shipping and billing information before being presented with the PayPal button. This may be a simpler implementation to do than providing an alternate checkout path, but it is frankly a waste of time, and surprisingly prevalent in PayPal implementations.
The correct method is to implement the alternative payment method as a button at the start of the checkout process, probably on the cart summary page. You can see a good example here of this at PacSun.com, an apparel site, but note the competing calls-to-action problem here as well.
PacSun deals with this slightly differently on mobile devices by not offering V.me. as a payment alternative. This avoids having a four choice vertical list of competing calls-to-action.
Alternative payments can undoubtedly result in higher conversions. However, to be effective they need to be implemented correctly to provide an alternative checkout flow, not simply a payment alternative to credit cards. This takes more effort to implement, but it is worth it. Implementing one payment method properly is a better route than superficially implementing multiple payment methods. This is especially true for mobile sales where the goal is to eliminate data entry as much as possible and alternate payments can do this very effectively. As mobile commerce becomes more important, so will alternative payments, for all merchants.
3. Which Payment Method?
Since there are multiple choices, the obvious route is to adopt PayPal. PayPal claims over 30 million U.S. mobile customers, and over a 100 million active accounts…which is a larger base than any of its competitors. SeeWhy found that 34 percent of U.S. consumers shopping online had PayPal accounts as of July 2013.
However, PayPal also carries some baggage. Having grown up as a payment method of choice for eBay, its reputation is not always considered positive. Some consumers are wary about PayPal, having had negative experiences in the past, probably with smaller merchants on eBay. In fact, according to SeeWhy’s analysis, two thirds of PayPal account holders state that their preferred payment method is a credit card.
Merchants selling luxury items might want to consider alternatives before implementing PayPal because of its reputation issues. Google Wallet is an alternative that is growing fast in part because of the growth of Android smartphones where a Google Wallet account is required to use the Play store, the Android equivalent of the app store. Google Wallet can also be linked to Google+ social sign on, so if you are considering implementing social sign on as well this might be a route to consider.
Both Visa’s V.me and MasterCard’s MasterPass both hold significant potential but the companies are only just beginning to roll out their service. It’s also worth noting that both Visa and MasterCard are rolling out their services through the acquiring banks. This will cause a proliferation of payment choices, leading to complexity and confusion for the shopper. You can see this already with MasterPass where having selected the Buy with MasterPass option, you are then presented with an array of different MasterPass wallets to choose from. Currently there are only six options, but what happens when there are hundreds?
Posted in e-commerce & m-commerce, Electronic Payments, Mobile Payments, Smartphone Tagged with: billing, calls-to-action, card entry, checkout, conversion, credit cards, e-commerce, ebay, ecommerce, electronic, google, MasterCard, masterpass, mobile commerce, mobile sales, mobile shopping, payments, PayPal, process, screens, shipping, smartphone, visa, wallet
December 5th, 2013 by Elma Jane
Three key benefits mPOS can provide PSPs. mPOS:
1. Maintains A Continuity Of Operations
mPOS solutions also ease the process of accepting and approving payments, according to the white paper. By enabling face-to-face card present transactions, mPOS allows transactions to be conducted in a highly secure manner. Further, once the encrypted transaction data is decrypted securely by the PSP at the payment gateway (with no access granted to the merchant), the onward presentation of the data into the acquiring network is consistent with that used historically for traditional POS terminals.
2. Simplifies Merchant Support
Thales suggests the biggest benefit to PSPs is that mPOS reduces the variety of costs PSPs need to cover to support merchants, cutting expenses related to equipment, security and PCI DSS compliance. This, the white paper says, allows PSPs that utilize mPOS to better allocate resources toward handling higher transaction volumes and acquiring business.
3. Supports Both Magnetic Stripe and EMV Cards
Another benefit to PSPs is that mPOS, despite its recent entrance to the market, is already widely available. The white paper explains that since the mPOS revolution quickly migrated from the U.S. abroad, mPOS solutions now exist to serve the unique needs of both markets. While this means challenges for merchants operating globally, PSPs benefit from being able to address the needs of merchants who want to opt for any and all available market solutions.
Much has been said about the recent explosion of the mobile point-of-sale (mPOS) market and how micromerchants are driving this payments revolution. But, what this story doesn’t communicate effectively is that small merchants aren’t the only stakeholders benefiting from the ongoing mPOS migration.
Payment service providers (PSPs) are another member of the mPOS value chain that can gain flexibility and security through these solutions, new research from data protection solution provider Thales suggests.
“Both merchants and PSPs have operational and logistical issues with traditional POS terminals associated mainly with the highly controlled and certified environment in which they must be used,” Thales writes in its latest white paper on the topic, “mPOS: Secure Mobile Card Acceptance.”
The 27-page white paper provides an extensive overview of the ongoing POS revolution, explaining how mPOS can reduce friction and costs for merchants, illustrating how the technology works step-by-step and highlighting the roles that each stakeholder plays along the value chain.
Posted in Electronic Payments, Mobile Payments, Mobile Point of Sale, Payment Card Industry PCI Security, Point of Sale, Smartphone Tagged with: acceptance, acquiring network, card present, compliance, decrypted, DSS, emv cards, encrypted, face-to-face, magnetic stripe, merchant, micromerchants, migration, mobile card, mobile point of sale, MPOS, payment gateway, payment service providers, payments, PCI, POS, psps, secure, securely, Security, terminals, transactions
November 14th, 2013 by Elma Jane
Micropayments provide faster results and some immediate gratification that can keep you motivated. Rather than eating out or splurging on something that you don’t really need, immediately apply that money to pay down your credit card balance. Instead of paying a certain amount once a month, divide that payment in half and pay that amount every two weeks. Consumers can even sign up for an electronic transfer of your funds to take place every two weeks. By the end of the year, you will have made 26 payments or the equivalent of 13 monthly payments. The extra monthly payment resulting from this payment plan will enable you to pay down your debt at a faster pace.
If you are planning to make micropayments, consumers may want to call their credit card company to verify that separate payments can be made and will be credited to their monthly minimum. See if your issuer has any restrictions or limitations on making additional payments.
Holiday shopping is just around the corner, and consumers need to have their credit card balances as low as possible in order to avoid costly interest charges. One way to do this is to make micropayments on their credit card bill. While we are conditioned to pay our credit card bill once a month, consumers can actually make a number of smaller payments throughout the month. Some banks and issuers allow payments to be made as often as once a day. If you carry a balance, micropayments can reduce the interest because most credit card companies charge interest based on your average daily balance during the month. Pay more often and you reduce your average daily balance and therefore the interest you pay that month.
If you have more than one card with a balance, keep paying the minimums for each card, but pick one card to pay off first. Select either the card with the highest interest rate (save more money) or the card with the lowest balance (pay it off faster). Stop charging on that card, using another card for purchases.
There are several other advantages to making micropayments when paying down credit card debt:
You may have better control of your payments. If you are paid weekly or bi-weekly, money can slip away by the end of the month. Designate a specific day after you are paid to send in a payment for your credit card. Four $50 payments or two $100 payments are sometimes easier to make than a monthly $200 payment. It is also easier to add a little extra money to smaller payments.
In time, micropayments can help raise your credit score. An organized, scheduled payment plan can help you avoid late payments and pay more than the minimum due. Both of these are important elements for a good credit score.
Micropayments can reduce financial stress. Making payments right after payday at a time when you actually have the money will likely reduce anxiety and financial stress.
The higher your interest rate, the more you will save.
The disadvantage to the micropayment plan is that it takes time, organization and financial discipline to make the plan work and this may be difficult for some people.
Posted in Electronic Payments, Financial Services, Visa MasterCard American Express Tagged with: balance, bill, consumers, credit-card, credited, debt, elements, financial, interest, issuers, limitations, micropayments, money, monthly minimum, pay, payments, purchases, shopping
